![]()
A table showing the positions of stars near the
316
THE STARS
**Limitations of the Direct Method**
The direct, or trigonometric, method of determining stellar parallaxes diminishes in accuracy as more distant stars are observed. The probable error of the most reliable parallaxes, in which several independent measures are averaged, is of the order of 0' .002. For the very nearest stars this error is less than 1 per cent of the parallax. The percentage of probable error increases as the parallax decreases; it is 10 per cent for a parallax of 0' .02. If the observed parallax is 0' .015, or 0' .008, it follows that the probability of the probable error that the chance is one half that the true value lies between 0' .012 and 0' .008, or that the star's distance is between 83 and 125 parsecs. It is equally probable that the true value is outside these limits.
Thus the percentage of error in measuring the distances of stars by the direct method increases as the distance and becomes very large for distances exceeding 100 parsecs, or about 300 light years. Because of the uncertainty many investigations of the stars depends on the knowledge of their distances, astronomers have sought for and have discovered indirect ways of determining the parallaxes of more remote stars. These will be noted as we proceed, but we should always be aware that the indirect methods require calibration.
**MOTIONS OF THE STARS**
As a result of trying to determine parallaxes, Edmund Halley, in 1718, was the first to demonstrate that the stars are not "fixed." He showed that certain bright stars had moved from the places they occupied in Ptolemy's ancient catalog by about the moon's apparent diameter. The stars are moving in various directions relative to one another. Their movements through space are often swift, but seem very slow to us because of the great distances of the stars.
**Two Projections of a Star's Motion**
(1) Proper motion (p) is the rate of change in the star's direction, or apparent place on the celestial sphere; this angular rate decreases, in general, as the star's distance is greater. (2) Radial velocity ($v_r$) is the star's speed of approach or recession; this linear rate is independent of the distance and is often the only projection of the motion that can be measured. The
11.6
observed motion may be referred to the sun by correcting for the effects of the earth's motions.
Proper motions, radial velocities, and distances of the stars constitute the basic data in the studies of stellar motions.
The proper motions of stars are determined by comparing their right ascensions and declinations in catalogs of star positions that are separated by sufficient intervals of time. The rates of change in these coordinates are the required data, after allowance has been made for apparent displacements of the stars caused by precession and other motions of the earth. By this procedure the proper motions of all lucid stars have become known with considerable accuracy.
However, the derived proper motions slowly deviate from those assigned. The reason for this is that the coordinate system in which they are determined is not an inertial system and slowly deteriorates due to galactic rotation. To overcome this, an effort is being made to set up a coordinate system using galaxies as the fundamental defining points. Galaxies are so far away that their motions can be neglected. One way of overcoming this difficulty is to use radio interferometers and radio point sources that are known or believed to be far distant. The method depends only upon a knowledge of the baseline, the rotation of the earth and an ability to identify the central fringe. Once this independent coordinate system is set up it can be transferred to the stars by optical techniques since the majority of the radio sources used now have optical identifications as well.
Many thousand stars with large proper motions have been detected and measured by comparison of star positions in two photographs of the same region of the heavens obtained at different times. These motions are called **relative proper motions**. The comparison is relatively simple and rapid because precession and nutation cause only small apparent displacements of stars, with the exception of parallax, are nearly on the same small area of the sky. Such proper motion surveys have been carried out since the application of the photographic plate to astronomy. Monumental and carefully planned surveys have been conducted by W. J. Luyten, first with small astrophotographic cameras and later using the Palomar Schmidt telescope. A new large-scale survey is being carried out by H. Giclas at Lowell Observatory by using the existing 60-inch secant plates as his first epoch material. These plates reach a faint limiting magnitude, provide a forty-year interval and cover a very broad region centered on the ecliptic.
The method of "blinking" is effective for the detection of any differences between two photographs that are being compared. The two plates are arranged under a blink microscope so that corresponding star images
**11.7 Proper Motions**
317
318
THE STARS
appear superposed. By mechanical means the plates are alternately hidden several times a second. If all the stars in the region have not moved appreciably between the exposure times, the appearance is the same as before the blinking began. If a star is displaced on one plate relative to the other, the result is a jumping effect, which at once attracts the observer's attention.
The largest known proper motion is that of a telescopic star called "Barnard's star" after the name of the astronomer who first noticed its swift motion. This 10th-magnitude star in Ophiuchus is moving with respect to neighboring stars at the rate of $10^{-3}$ a year, so that it advances in 175 years through an angle equal to the moon's apparent diameter. If all the stars were moving as fast as this and at random, the forms of the constellations would be altered appreciably in the course of a lifetime. As it is, the known proper motions of only about 330 stars exceed 1° a year, and the average for all the naked-eye stars is not greater than 0.2° a year.
We have noted that the proper motion is angular. A star having a large proper motion may actually be in rapid motion, or it may be nearer us than most stars, or both, as is true of Barnard's star. We have also noted that the proper motion relates only to that part of the star's motion that is transverse to the line of sight.
Figure 11.8
Barnard's star (marked with an arrow in both photographs) in June, 1937 (left) and in August, 1962 (right). Notice its motion against the background stars in the course of 25 years. Proper motion: $10^{-3}$ per year. (
![]()
Lowell Observatory Photograph)
Figure 11.9A
Doppler displacements in stellar spectra, on stars HD 161096 (top) and HD 66141 (bottom). The different radial velocities are immediately noticeable. (David Dunlap Observatory Photograph, University of Toronto)
A star's rate of motion directly toward or away from us, or its radial velocity, is shown by the displacement of the lines of its spectrum from their normal positions. By the Doppler effect (4.9), the wavelengths are shortened if the star is approaching us and are lengthened if the star is receding from us. The wavelength change in their lengths is directly proportional to the star's radial velocity. In the case represented by the spectrum, the lines are displaced respectively toward the violet and the red end. The more general terms shortward and longward denote without ambiguity the direction of the displacement of the lines in any region of the spectrum. If, for example, a line at 4000 angstroms is displaced 1 angstrom toward the violet, the star is approaching us with a speed of $$\frac{v_s}{c} = \frac{\Delta\lambda}{\lambda} C$$
The spectrograph is attached at the eye-end of the telescope, with the slit at the focus of the objective. With it the bright-line spectrum of a laboratory source, often iron or titanium, may also be photographed above and below the star's spectrum. The photograph, or spectrogram (Fig. 11.9A), is observed under a microscope and the radial velocities of the lines are measured micrometrically with respect to the comparison lines of the laboratory source, which have no Doppler displacements. The measurements are then reduced to the sun's position by correcting for the earth's orbital motion.
![]()
A black-and-white spectrogram showing spectral lines displaced toward both violet and red ends.
11.9
Radial Velocities
$$v_s = \frac{\Delta\lambda}{\lambda} C$$
320
THE STARS
![]()
A diagram of a simple grating spectrograph. The components include a collimator, a blue filter, a spherical mirror, a film holder, a corrector plate, and a grating. The collimator is shown at the top left, with a blue line indicating the direction of light entering. The blue filter is shown to the right of the collimator, and the spherical mirror is shown below the filter. The film holder is shown to the right of the mirror, and the corrector plate is shown below the film holder. The grating is shown at the bottom right.
Figure 11.9B
Diagram of a simple grating spectrograph.
A catalog by R. E. Wilson lists the radial velocities of more than 15,000 stars. Velocities up to 30 km/sec, or about 20 miles a second, are common; those exceeding 100 km/sec are rare.
11.10 Annual Variation in the Radial Velocities
The earth's revolution around the sun causes a variation in the observed radial velocities of the stars during the year. When the earth is moving toward a star, the lines in the star's spectrum are displaced to shorter wavelengths; when the earth is moving away from the star, the lines are displaced to longer wavelengths than they would otherwise have. The observed radial velocities may be corrected for this and some other effects of the earth's motion.
The annual variation in the radial velocities provides another means (7.16) of determining the earth's distance from the sun. H. Spencer Jones derived in this way the value of 149,427,830 km, which is not far from the mean distance currently adopted.
As a simplified example, consider a star at the ecliptic and at rest. Once in a year the earth is moving directly toward the star. Six months
MOTIONS OF THE STARS
321
![]()
A diagram showing the orbit of a star around the Earth. The star is labeled "Star at Ecliptic" and the Earth's orbit is shown with arrows indicating its direction. The diagram also shows the radial velocity lines of the star oscillating in a period of a year.
**Figure 11.10**
Annual Variation in the Radial Velocity of a Star. Because of the earth's revolution, the lines in the spectrum of a star oscillate in a period of a year. The effect is greatest for a star' on the ecliptic.
later it is moving directly away from the star. On each occasion the radial velocity of the star as determined from the displacement of its spectrum lines is numerically equal to the speed of the earth's revolution. Suppose that this speed is 30 km per second. Since one earth orbit is a circle. Multiplying 29.6 km per second by 31,558,150, about 365 number of seconds in the sidereal year, we find for the circumference of the orbit nearly 940 million km. Dividing this value by $2 \times 3.1416$ we have for the mean radius of the orbit about 149,500,000 km.
When the annual proper motion, $\mu$, of a star and its parallax, $p$, are known, the tangential velocity, $v_{\mathrm{t}}$, can be calculated. The **inertial velocity** is the star's velocity in kilometers per second with respect to the sun at right angles to the line of sight.
$$v_{\mathrm{r}} = \frac{4.74 \mu}{p}$$
When the star's radial velocity, $v_{\mathrm{r}}$, is known as well, the **space velocity**, $v$, which is the star's velocity with respect to the sun, can be derived. The space velocities of the stars in the sun's vicinity are generally of the same type.
![]()
A diagram showing three axes: Distance (x-axis), Radial Velocity (y-axis), and Space Velocity (z-axis). A point labeled 'r' represents a star's position in space. The labels indicate that 'Distance' is along x-axis, 'Radial Velocity' is along y-axis, and 'Space Velocity' is along z-axis. The diagram also shows that 'Proper Motion' is perpendicular to both 'Distance' and 'Radial Velocity'. The labels 'Proper Motion', 'Radial Velocity', 'Space Velocity', and 'Tangential Velocity' are written near their respective axes.'
**Figure 11.11**
Relation between space velocity, tangential velocity, radial velocity, proper motion, and distance of a star.
$$v^2 = v_{\mathrm{r}}^2 + v_{\mathrm{t}}^2$$
322
THE STARS
order as the velocities of the planets in their revolutions around the sun; the majority are between 8 and 30 km a second. Among the brightest stars, Arcturus has the highest space velocity; it is 135 km/sec, or 84 miles a second.
11.12
The Sun's Motion
Although the space velocities of the stars are referred to the sun, the sun itself is one of the stars and is in motion among them. It is therefore important to determine how the sun is moving and to be able to correct the space velocities for the effects of this motion.
If the sun with its planetary system is moving in a certain direction among the stars around it and if the stars have random motions, these stars should seem to be passing by in the opposite direction. The stars ahead of us should seem to be approaching toward us, while the apex of the sun's way, the point of the celestial sphere toward which the sun's motion is directed. The stars behind us should seem to be closing in toward the opposite apex. So reasoned W. Herschel, the pioneer in the study of sidereal astronomy. Although the proper motions of only 13 stars were then available, he determined, in 1783, the position of the apex within $10^{\circ}$ of the place now assigned to the "standard apex."
Figure 11.12
Apparent Motions of Stars Caused by the Solar Motion. The stars seem to be drifting away from the point on the celestial sphere toward which the sun is moving.
![]()
A diagram showing apparent motions of stars caused by solar motion. The apex (Apex) is at the top center, and Aniapex (Aniapex) is at the bottom center. Stars are shown moving around these points.
11.13
The Standard Apex of the Sun's Way
This is referred to the average of the stars visible to the naked eye. It is situated approximately in right ascension $18^h$ $0^m$ and declination + $30^o$, in the constellation Hercules about $10^o$ southwest of the bright star Vega.
With respect to these stars the solar system is moving in this direction at the rate of 20 km/sec. In the course of a year we progress through the local field of stars 4 times as far as the distance from the earth to
MOTIONS OF THE STARS
323
the sun. The corresponding antapex is in the constellation Columba, about 30° south of Orion's belt.
The more recent determinations are based on the proper motions and also the radial velocities of thousands of stars. When the radial velocities are employed, the apex is evidently the point around which the stars have a greater average velocity of approach, while around the antapex they have a greater average velocity of recession. This range is the speed of the sun's motion relative to these particular stars. The positions from the proper motions and radial velocities nearly agree, as they should, because the reference stars are in both cases in the sun's neighborhood.
When the motions of more distant stars are studied, the apex of the sun's way is displaced progressively toward the northeast. Thus, from their analysis of the proper motions of 18,000 of the brighter telescopic stars, P. van de Kamp and A. N. Vysootsky located the apex in right ascension 19°0' and declination +36°, in the constellation Lyra. As we will comment on later, this is because the sun and the stars in its vicinity are moving swiftly toward Cygnus in the rotation of our galaxy.
It is very interesting that the position of the apex differs depending upon our selection of objects, for example: early-type stars or late-type stars, planetary nebulae or interstellar hydrogen, etc. Apparently the dynamics of the Galaxy plays a determining role and by studying these differences we can learn something about it. When using radial velocities to determine the apex we obtain the reflected solar motion as well. The largest differences for various types of stars and objects as we might expect: the largest difference from that given by stars in the solar neighborhood being for the late F stars.
We have seen that the direct parallax method is limited to the nearer stars. For those distant ones the diameter of the earth's orbit is too short to serve as an adequate base line. At first sight it might seem that the sun's motion could provide an ideal base for measuring stellar parallaxes. In only one year it takes us a distance twice as great as the diameter of the earth's orbit. If this longer base line is still too short to afford appreciable parallax of the distant stars, we could wait two years or perhaps a hundred, until it would become long enough. Such a parallax is called statistical.
Because the stars have motions of their own, it is generally impossible to say what part of a star's proper motion is a parallax effect and what part is peculiar to the star itself. Thus the longer base line provided by the sun's motion cannot be used to determine the distances of individual stars, although it has given reliable average parallaxes of groups of stars. This is referred to as a statistical parallax.
11.14 Stellar Distances from the Solar Motion
324
THE STARS
STELLAR SPECTRA
The light from a star is the sum total of energy of many wavelengths.
This light when spread out to display the spectrum comes to us
vital astrophysical information depending upon the presence or absence of
certain wavelengths.
These are made in two different ways. One method employs a complete
spectroscope with its slit at the focus of the telescope objective (Fig.
11.9A). Reflecting prisms over the ends of the slit bring in the light of
a laboratory source on either side of the beam of starlight. The bright
comparison lines of the source appear in the photograph adjacent to the
star's spectrum; these can serve as standards for measuring wavelengths
and Doppler shifts in the star's spectrum. This method gives the spec-
trum of only one star at a time and is rather wasteful of light. The present
limit of this method is that a single night exposure is a low-dispersion
spectrum of an 18th-magnitude star. This improves to about 20th mag-
nitude using electronic image intensifiers.
The objective prism method is preferred when the spectra of many
stars are to be examined, as in the classification of stellar spectra. A
large prism of small angle is placed in front of the telescope objective,
Figure 11.15
Objective prism for the
Michigan Schmidt telescope
at the Cerro Tololo Inter-
american Observatory in
Chile. (Photograph courtesy
of the Cerro Tololo Inter-
american Observatory)
![]()
A man operating a large telescope with a large objective prism attached to it.
STELLAR SPECTRA
325
so that the whole apparatus becomes a spectroscope without slit or col-
limator. The photograph shows appropriately widened spectra of all stars
of sufficient brightness in the field of view. Exposure times are restricted
by the light of the sky, as in direct photography. The method is now
limited to stars brighter than photographic magnitude 12 or 13.
The photographic study of stellar spectra with the objective prism was
inaugurated, in 1885, by E. Pickering at Harvard Observatory. This work
was carried on for many years under the immediate direction of Annie J.
Cannon. The Henry Draper Catalogue, in 9 volumes completed in 1924,
gives the approximate positions, magnitudes, and spectral types of 225,300
stars in all parts of the heavens. Its extensions, particularly to fainter
stars in the southern hemisphere, have been made by W. H. Keeler.
One of the outstanding results of the program was the discovery that
the great majority of stellar spectra can be arranged in a single continuous
sequence. This gradation is the basis of the Draper Classification, for which
Miss Cannon was chiefly responsible. Various stages in the sequence are
denoted by the principal types O, B, A, F, G, K, and M, which are sub-
divided into subclasses. For example, a Co star is halfway between G0
and K0; B2 is nearer to B0 than to A0. Fully 69 per cent of the stars are
included in the types from B to M.
Four additional types complete the Harvard sequence. These are W
now paired with O at the blue end, and R-N and 5, which form two
side branches near the red end; the first branches off between G and K,
and then run between K and L. Of course, these represent a dimin-
ishing surface temperature and increasing redness of the stars. We note
here the main features of the changing patterns along the sequence in
the visible region of the spectrum, leaving further description and ex-
planation for the following chapter, especially the refinements that iden-
tify various luminosity classes.
The Harvard classification was based on gradations in the patterns of the
spectral lines and was independent of theoretical considerations. The
sequence is characterized particularly by the rise and decline in the
strength of the hydrogen lines throughout its extent. Lines of other ele-
ments become prominent at different stages of the sequence, and bands
of chemical compounds appear toward the end of the sequence. The main
features in the visual spectra of the different types are as follows:
Type O. Lines of ionized helium, oxygen, and nitrogen appear along
with those of hydrogen. Type W contains the bright-line Wolf-
Kayer stars.
Type B. Lines of neutral helium are most intense at B2 and then fade,
(See Plate I)
11.16
The Classification of Stellar Spectra
11.17
The Sequence of Stellar Spectra
Figure 11.17
Objective prism plate of region NE of NGC 3532. Note bright emission line star on lower left. (Photograph by A. G. Davis Philip using Michigan Curtis Schmidt telescope with Warner and Swasey ultraviolet prism at Cerro Tololo)
until at B9 they have practically disappeared. Hydrogen lines increase in intensity throughout the subdivisions. Examples are Spica and Rigel.
Type A. Hydrogen lines attain maximum intensity at A2. Examples are Sirius and Vega. B and A stars are blue.
326
MAGNITUDES OF THE STARS
327
Type F. Hydrogen lines are declining. Lines of metals are increasing in intensity, notably the Fraunhofer H and K of ionized calcium. Canopus and Procyon are examples.
Type G. Lines of metals are prominent. These stars are yellow. The sun (type G2) and Capella are examples.
Type K. Lines of metals increase in strength. Hydrogen lines in strength. Bands of cyanogen and other molecules are becoming prominent. These stars are reddish. Examples are Arcturus and Aldebaran.
Type M. Bands of titanium oxide become increasing prominent up to their maximum at M7. The cooler members classified by J. J. Nasmyth and associated with M10 have the strengthening of vanadium oxide bands. Betelgeuse and Antares are examples of this red type.
Types R and N show bands of carbon and carbon compounds, type S of zirconium oxide and lanthanum oxide.
**MAGNITUDES OF THE STARS**
A star's magnitude is its brightness according to certain accepted standards. Standards, however, sometimes confusing, have given way to increasingly more rigorous methods of measurement. As statistical subtle brightness differences improves and as astronomers improve their ability to measure brightnesses in more and more rigorously defined wavelength bands.
The grading of the naked-eye stars in early times into 6 magnitudes (1.25) was intended primarily to assist in identifying the stars. There is no evidence that the choice of 6 groups, rather than some other number, was governed by any definite idea of fixed numerical relations between the groups. For many centuries afterward, the magnitudes of the stars were accepted as they appeared in Ptolemy's catalog. It was not until the coming of the telescope that stellar magnitudes began to enter as important factors into astronomical investigations, as in statistical studies of the structure of the stellar system.
11.18
The Scale of Magnitudes
328
THE STARS
About 1830, John Herschel concluded that a geometrical progression in the apparent brightness of the stars is associated with the arithmetical progression of their magnitudes. The problem was then to ascertain the constant ratio of brightness corresponding to a difference of 1 magnitude that would best represent the magnitudes already assigned to the lucid stars. Pogson, at Radebeul, made precise observations of the ratio having the logarithm 0.4, a convenient value nearly equal to the average ratio derived from his observations and those of other astronomers. He adjusted the zero of this fixed scale so as to secure as good agreement as possible with the early catalog at the 6th magnitude. This is essentially the present scale.
Pogson's law is a special case of a general psycho-physical relation established, in 1834, by the physiologist Weber and given a more precise phrasing later by Fechner. By Fechner's law, $R = \log S$ where $R$ is the intensity of a sensation, $S$ is the stimulus producing it, and $\epsilon$ is a constant factor of proportionality. Pogson had evaluated the constant in the corresponding relation: $m - n = \log (l_n / l_m)$ where $l_m$ and $l_n$ are the apparent brightnesses of two stars having the magnitudes $m$ and $n$, respectively. The constant is 2.512, or 0.4, or 1/log 2.512. If the difference, $m - n$ is 1 magnitude, $l_n / l_m = 2.512$.
We have seen that the ratio of brightness between two stars differing by exactly 1 magnitude is the number having the logarithm 0.4, which is about 2.512. A few values where the magnitude difference is a whole number are as follows:
| Magnitude Difference |
Ratio of Brightness |
| 1.0 magnitude |
2.512 |
| 2.0 magnitudes |
1.31 |
| 3.0 magnitudes |
15.85 |
| 4.0 magnitudes |
39.8 |
| 5.0 magnitudes |
100.0 |
In general, the ratio of apparent brightness, $l_n / l_m$, of two stars or other sources of light of magnitudes $m$ and $n$ can be derived by the formula:
$$\log (l_n / l_m) = 0.4(m - n).$$
It is to be noted that the number expressing the magnitude diminishes algebraically as the brightness increases, and that the choice of the zero point makes the magnitudes of the very brightest celestial objects negative. The apparent visual magnitude of a star is +4.4, that of the planet Venus at greatest brilliancy is −4.4, of the full moon is
MAGNITUDES OF THE STARS
329
-12.6, and of the sun is -26.8. The photographic magnitude of the faintest star recorded with the 200-inch telescope is +23.9.
The following examples illustrate some of the uses of the relation between apparent brightness and magnitude:
1. How much brighter is Sirius (magnitude -1.4) than a star of the magnitude +23.07?
Answer: $\log \left(\frac{l_{\text{Sirius}}}{l_{\text{star}}}\right) = 0.4 \times 25.3 = 10.12$
$l_{\text{Sirius}}/l_{\text{star}}$ is about 13,200 million times.
2. Nova Aquilae, in the course of two or three days in June, 1918, increased in brightness about 45,000 times. How many magnitudes did it rise?
Answer: $\log \left(\frac{l_{\text{Nova}}}{l_{\text{star}}}\right) = \log 45,000 = 4.65 = 0.4(m-n)$
$m-n = 4.65/0.4 = 11.6$ magnitudes.
3. The bright star Castor, which appears single to the naked eye, is resolved by the telescope into two stars of magnitudes 3.99 and 2.85. What is the magnitude of the two stars combined?
Answer: $\log \left(\frac{l_{\text{Castor}}}{l_{\text{star}}}\right) = 0.4 \times 0.86 = 0.344$
$l_{\text{Castor}}/l_{\text{star}} = 2.21; (l_{\text{Castor}}+l_{\text{star}})/l_{\text{star}} = l_{\text{Castor}}/l_{\text{star}} = 3.21$
$\log \left(\frac{l_{\text{Castor}}}{l_{\text{star}}}\right) = 0.307 - 0.4(m-x)$
$m-x = 0.307/0.4 = 1.27$
$x = 2.88 - 1.27 = 1.58$, the combined magnitude.
The apparent magnitude of a star refers to its observed brightness, depending on its actual brightness and its distance from us. The value for a particular star varies with the region of the spectrum to which the receiver of the star's radiation is sensitive. If the receiver is the eye alone or the eye at the telescope, it is also the visual magnitude that is determined.
Visual methods for determining magnitudes are now generally replaced by the more reliable photographic and photoelectric methods. By use of a suitable color filter and a specially stained plate, or still more accurately by means of a photometer, it is possible to determine the magnitude on the visual scale. This *photometric magnitude* ($m_p$) is usually meant when we refer to the visual magnitude.
The *photographic magnitude* ($m_p$) of a star is its magnitude as shown in a blue-sensitive photograph. It is generally determined by the size of the star's round image, which is larger and also denser as the star is brighter, and by comparison with stars of known magnitudes in the same photograph, or by measuring directly on a similar plate after developing the plate with an eyepiece. For greater accuracy the star's image is measured with special apparatus. A single measure on a photographic plate with an iris photometer can determine the brightness of a star with a probable error of about 0.03 magnitude.
11.20
Visual and Photographic Magnitudes
330
THE STARS
![]()
A star field in Perseus (15.9). Note how star images are larger for stars of the same spectral type. (Lick Observatory Photograph by L. Herbig)
Figure 11.20
C.I. = M$_{\mathrm{pe}}$ - M$_{\mathrm{s}}$
= m$_{\mathrm{pe}}$ - m$_{\mathrm{s}}$
The difference between the photographic and photovisual magnitudes is defined as the color index (C.I.) of a star. The color index is further defined as having a value of zero for an AO star. From the radiation curve it is clear that stars having spectral types earlier than AO will have color indexes that are negative.
11.21 Photoelectric Photometry
The superior accuracy (0.01 magnitudes or better) of the photoelectric technique compared to visual and photographic techniques has led to its use in astronomy, though earlier methods. An important advantage of photoelectric photometry is that the photocathode responds directly proportionally to the intensity of light falling upon it. A disadvantage is that only one star can be measured at a time. It is also difficult to allow for the sky light in congested areas, as in the Milky Way. Where many stars are to be observed, the procedure is generally set up magnitude standards in the area with the photomultiplier and then go on with photography.
Diaphragm
Filter
Field Lens
Photocathode
Amplifier
Photomultiplier
High Voltage
Recorder
![]()
A schematic drawing of a photovoltaic photometer.
**Figure 11.21**
Schematic Drawing of a Photovoltaic Photometer.
| NAME |
SPECTRUM |
APPARENT MAGNITUDE |
COLOR B-V |
PARALLAX |
ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES |
| Sirius |
A1 V |
-1.43 |
+0.00 |
9°.377 |
+1.5 |
| Canopus |
F0 Ia |
-0.73 |
+0.15 |
0.18 |
-4.4 |
| Alpha Centauri, d |
G2 V |
-0.27* |
+0.66 |
760 |
+4.1 |
| Arcturus |
K2 IIIp |
-0.06 |
+1.23 |
0.90 |
-0.3 |
| Vega |
G0 V |
-0.04* |
+0.29* |
0.29* |
-0.6 |
| Capella (G0) |
(G0) |
+0.09 |
+0.80 |
0.73 |
-0.6 |
| Rigel (K7 IV) |
B8 Ia |
+0.15 |
-0.04 |
0.05 |
-6.4 |
| Pryseon (F7 IV) |
B5 IVb+g+e+g' |
+3.71* |
+387* |
2.7 |
| Achernar (B3 V) |
B3 V |
+0.53 |
-0.16
0.23
-2.7
| Beta Centauri, d (M4 II) |
B5.5 V M4 II +3.71* +87* +0.17* |
\n\nd indicates a double star with a magnitude difference less than 5 combined magnitudes are given.\n\ne indicates variable star.\n\(\ast\) Indicates estimated values.
**TABLE 11.II**
The Brightest Stars
| NAME |
SPECTRUM |
APPARENT MAGNITUDE ± 0.1 mag. |
COLOR B-V ± 0.1 mag. |
PARALLAX ± 1 arcsec (mas) ± 1% (if > 1 arcsec) |
ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDE ± 0.5 mag. |
MAGNITUDE CLASS ± 1 mag. |
HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS (from brightest to faintest) |
HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS (from brightest to faintest) |
HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS (from brightest to faintest) |
HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS (from brightest to faintest) |
HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS (from brightest to faintest) |
HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS (from brightest to faintest) |
HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS (from brightest to faintest) |
HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS (from brightest to faintest) |
HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS (from brightest to faintest) |
HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS (from brightest to faintest) |
HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS (from brightest to faintest) |
HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS (from brightest to faintest) |
HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS (from brightest to faintest) |
HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS (from brightest to faintest) |
HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS (from brightest to faintest) |
HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS (from brightest to faintest) |
| Sirius A & Sirius B*a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m,n,o,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,x,y,z,aa,ab,ac,ad,ae,af,ag,ah,ai,aj,ak,al,am,an,ao,ap,aq,ar,as,at,au,av,aw,xv,xw,xz,xaa,xab,xac,xad,xae,xaf,xag,xah,xai,xaj,xak,xal,xam,xan,xav,xaw,xxv,xxw,xxz,xxaa,xxab,xxac,xxad,xxae,xaf,xag,xah,xai,xaj,xak,xal,xam,xan,xav,xaw,xxv,xxw,xxz,xxaa,xxab,xxac,xxad,xxae,xaf,xag,xah,xai,xaj,xak,xal,xam,xan,xav,xaw, | b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m,n,o,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,x,y,z,aa,ab,ac,ad,ae,af,ag,ah,ai,aj,ak,al,am,an,ao,ap,aq,ar,as,at,au,av,aw, xv, xw, xz, xxaa, xxab, xxac, xxad, xxae, xaf, xag, xah, xai, xaj, xak, xal, xam, xan, xav, xaw,<br>
A1 V ± 1.43 ± 0.00 ± 1.5 ± 4.4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 ± 4 +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞ +∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞+ ∞± -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2.7 -2. |
| NAME | <NAME> d indicates a double star with a magnitude difference less than $s$ combined magnitudes are given.<\/small>\n\nd indicates variable star.<\/small>\n\(\ast\) Indicates estimated values.<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\(<\/small>\n\ (<\/sml>)SPECTRUM APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIERARCHY OF BRIGHTNESS HIER ARCHITY O F BRIGHTESS (FROM BRIGHTEST TO FAINTEST) NAME SPECTRUM APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNUITIES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNITUDES APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE MAGNUITIES APPARENT MAG NITUDE COLOR PARALLAX ABSOLUTE M AG NITUDE C O L O R P A R A L L A X ABSO L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M A G N I T U D E S ABR L U T E M AGNI TUDE C OLO R P AR ALLA X AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MA GN ITUDE S AB SO LU TE MAGNITUDES NAME APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APPEARANCE APEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEARANCES NAME SPECTRUM APPARANTAPPEEARANCES NAME SPectrum Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant Appearances Name Spectrums Apparant AppearanciesName Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Spectrum Appearence Sppectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Spectum Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specuume Specueme SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECUME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPECEME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE ME SPIE MeSPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEMESPIEM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PI EM ES PIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMEPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMESPIMISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISIISPISI ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IS ISP IsSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIPSISSIP SISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSISSI SSIIIIIIIIIIGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIGIG IGIIIIIIIIIHGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGH GHGHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIHGIIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIIHGIIIIIIIEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEG EGEEGE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GE GEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEGEEE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG GG
A schematic drawing of a photovoltaic photometer.
SPECTRUM APPARENT MAGNITUDE COLOR B-V PARIALX ABSOLUT E MAGNI TIES HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY HIE RCH IETY.
SPECTRUM BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZE BRONZEBRONZEBRONZEBRONZEBRONZEBRONZEBRONZEBRONZEBRONZEBRONZEBRONZEBRONZEBRONZEBRONZEBRONZEBRONZEBRONZEBRONZEBRONZEBRONZEBRONZEBRON
332
THE STARS
The **photoelectric photometer** places various filters in the light path before the photomultiplier tube. Standard filter systems have been set up, the one in most general use being the U, B, V System (ultraviolet, blue, visual) introduced by H. Johnson and W. Morgan. Colors analogous to the color index (U-B) and (B-V) in magnitudes. Other more highly differentiating systems, such as the u, v, b, y (ultraviolet, violet, blue, yellow) system advocated by B. Stronge, are coming more and more into use.
The 25 stars brighter than apparent visual magnitude +1.5 are listed in order of brightness in Table 11.II which first appeared in Sky & Telescope, August, 1957. The magnitudes, as given by H. L. Johnson, have been corrected for atmospheric extinction. The two luminosity classes are on the Morgan-Keenan system (12.20); they refer to the brighter components where the stars are visual doubles. Types from B to M are represented. The bluer stars, having the largest negative color indexes (11.24), are Alpha and Beta Crucis and Spica; the reddest are Betelgeuse and Antares.
These stars are generally not the brightest in the sky because they are the nearest to us, but because they are intrinsically bright. Although Alpha Centauri, Sirius, and Procyon are among the nearest stars, others such as Rigel, Canopus, and Deneb are so remote that they must be highly luminous to appear so bright. The significance of the last column of the table is explained later in this chapter.
All but six of the brightest stars are visible at some times in the year throughout the world; they become visible in their seasons south of about the following north latitudes: Canopus, 38°; Acheron, 33°; Alpha and Beta Centauri and Beta Crucis, 30°; Alpha Crucis, 28°.
In many investigations that involve the apparent magnitudes of stars, the magnitudes must all conform to the same scale. Standard magnitude scales have been set up as a means of control for all observers. They are sequences of stars in limited areas, having their magnitudes well determined and grading in brightness by small steps. The Mount Wilson north polar sequence of F. H. Seares long served as primary standards for photovisual and photographic magnitudes.
The greater accuracy of photoelectric photometry is employed in the newer methods of determining stellar distances and Palomar sequences in certain areas are based on magnitudes of selected stars of the original north polar sequence and are extended to the fainter magnitudes observed with the 200-inch telescope.
A system of standard magnitudes determined photoelectrically with
| The Brightest Stars |
Magnitude Standards |
| 11.22 |
11.23 |
MAGNITUDES OF THE STARS 333
specified color filters has been established for the U, B, V filter system (11.21) by H. L. Johnson and W. W. Morgan for stars in various parts of the sky; for the red (R) at 7000 angstroms by R. Hardie, and infrared (I) at 8250 A by G. E. Kron.
The various spectral classes discussed in sections 11.16 and 11.17 are differentiated by their colors. One color already mentioned (11.21) is Star Colors
B-V and another U-B. Both colors are adjusted at zero value for a main sequence star of spectral type AO, such as Sirius. Due to the definition of the magnitude scale it is clear that these colors increase as a star is redder, because a red star appears brighter in yellow light and therefore has a numerically smaller magnitude than in blue light. Thus, the reddest stars have a negative value for their color and the blue stars have a slightly negative value for their color.
Negative color values approach a certain limiting value. From Planck's radiation formula and the total radiating disk we can derive a relationship between the absolute magnitude at a given wavelength ($M_\lambda$), and the radius (R) and the absolute temperature (T) that involves certain constants ($C_\lambda$, $\chi$).
$$M_\lambda = C_\lambda - 5 \log R + \frac{1.560}{\lambda T} + X$$
This formula can be evaluated at the visual and photographic wavelengths to give formulae for $M_{\text{pg}}$ and $M_v$, and the various constants can be evaluated in terms of the magnitude, radius and temperature of the sun. This gives us a very simple relationship for the Color Index (C.I.)
$$C.I = M_{\text{pg}} - M_v = \frac{7200}{T} - 0.04$$
and we see that even for an infinitely hot source the color index will not be more negative than -0.04. A slightly different numerical result occurs for the B-V. It is important to note that since we are using the color in the above formula it is not essential to know the absolute magnitudes.
A color index or other similar measurement is a numerical measure of the star's color and therefore of its spectral type if nothing intervenes in space to redden the light. If the spectral type is also known and if the measured color index is greater than would normally be expected for a star of that type, then one may reverse the presence and effect of any intervening cosmic dusty medium as was noted in last chapter. Values of B-V for the different spectral types are given in Table 12.II and may be found for the brightest stars from Table 11.III.
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
17
M_V
B - V
-0.5 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Figure 11.34A
Magnitude-color plot of the nearest stars. Note white dwarfs in the lower left portion of the diagram.
334
-1.0
0
U-B
+1.0
+2.0
-0.5 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 B-V
Figure 11.24B
Color-color plot of 708 bright stars. The main sequence is clearly defined.
335
-1.0
0
U-B
+1.0
+2.0
-0.5 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 B-V
Black Body Slope
Reddening Line
Figure 11.24C
Color-color plot of 662 of the nearest stars.
336
LUMINOSITIES OF STARS
The apparent magnitude of a star relates to its brightness as we observe it. This depends on the star's luminosity, or brightness at a specified distance, and on its actual distance. One star may appear brighter than another only because it is the nearer; thus the sun appears brighter than Capella. In order to rank the stars fairly with respect to luminosity, it is necessary to place them all at the same distance from us or, what amounts to the same thing, to calculate how bright they would appear if they were all at the same distance. By agreement the standard distance is 10 parsecs, or 32.6 light years.
The absolute magnitude of a star is the apparent magnitude it would have at the distance of 10 parsecs (parallax $0\degree$). We should note quite explicitly that this is a conventional definition of absolute magnitude since any other distance would do just as well. The absolute magnitude of a star is calculated by saying that a main sequence AO star shall have an absolute magnitude of 0.
When the parallax, $p'$, is known and the apparent magnitude, $m$, has been determined by observation, the absolute magnitude, $M$, can be calculated by the formula shown on the margin, where $r$ is the distance in parsecs. This important formula is derived from the relation between brightness and magnitude (11.19) and the fact that the brightness of a point source varies inversely as the square of its distance. The absolute magnitude is of the same sort as the apparent magnitude employed in its calculation; it may be visual, photographic, or some other kind.
The type being referred to is written as M, for absolute visual magnitude, $M_v$, for absolute photographic magnitude, etc. If a certain filter system is being referred to, e.g. the U, B, V system, we would write $M_u$, $M_b$ and $M_v$.
When the absolute magnitudes, $M_1$ and $M_2$, of any two stars are known, the ratio of their luminosities, $L_1$ and $L_2$, is given by the formula on the margin, which is the same relation already given for the apparent magnitudes.
$$\log(L_2/L_1)=0.4(M_2-M_1),$$
LUMINOSITIES OF STARS
337
11.25 Absolute Magnitudes
338
THE STARS
**Relative Luminosities**
It is the custom to express the luminosity of a star in terms of the sun's luminosity, that is, as the number of times the star would outshine the sun if both were the same distance from us. This ratio can be calculated by substituting the absolute magnitudes of the sun and star in the preceding formula.
The sun's apparent visual magnitude, $m_s$ is $-26.8$; its parallax, $p$, on the same basis as those of the stars, is the radian, $206.265^\circ$, of which the logarithm is 5.314. By the first formula of the preceding section, the sun's absolute visual magnitude, $M_s$ is $-26.8 + 5 + 26.6$, or +4.8. At the standard distance of 10 parsecs the sun would appear as a star of nearly the 5th magnitude, only faintly visible to the naked eye.
The expression for the star's visual luminosity relative to that of the sun is accordingly,
$$\log(\text{luminosity}) = 0.4(4.8 - \text{star's absolute magnitude}).$$
Because the majority of the brightest stars are more remote than 10 parsecs, they must be more luminous than the sun. Indeed, this is true of all stars of Table 11.II, as is shown by their absolute magnitudes. Rigel and Deneb are of the order of 10,000 times as luminous as the sun. On the other hand, we have noted in Table 11.I that many stars nearer us than the standard distance of 10 parsecs are visible only with the telescope, so that their absolute magnitudes are less luminous than the sun. The conclusion is that the stars differ very greatly in luminosity.
The foregoing formula is employed in the following examples.
(1) Compare the visual luminosities of Sirius and the sun. The absolute visual magnitude of Sirius is +1.5.
Answer: $\log L = (0.4(4.8 - 1.5)) = 1.3$. Thus Sirius is 23 times as luminous as the sun.
(2) Compare the luminosities of Barnard's star (absolute visual magnitude +13.2) and the sun.
Answer: $\log L = (0.4(4.8 - 13.2)) = -3.4 = 6.6 - 10$. Thus Barnard's star is 0.0004 as luminous as the sun.
When the absolute magnitudes of stars in our neighborhood are plotted against their spectral classes, as in Fig. 11.27, the majority of the points are arranged in a band running generally across the diagram, referred to as a "spectrum-luminosity diagram." The middle line of this band drops rather steadily along the spectral sequence from absolute magnitude $-3$ for B stars to fainter than +10 for M stars. This band is known as the main sequence.
The sun, a yellow star of type G2 and absolute visual magnitude +4.8, is a main-sequence star. It is about 100 times less luminous than the
**Stars of the Main Sequence**
A diagram showing a spectrum-luminosity diagram with various spectral classes and their corresponding absolute magnitudes.
Plate 1
Objective Prism Spectra. The field is centered on the Great Orion Nebula. The dispersion is north-south so the spectra can be widened by driving the telescope slightly slower than the sidereal rate. (Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan)
Plate II
Planet Mars. The orange hue is apparent and distinguishes Mars among the "naked-eye" planets. (Photograph from the Hale Observatories)
Plate III
Jupiter. Note one satellite on the right, and its shadow on the planet, slightly below and to the right of the famous red spot. (Lick Observatory photograph)
Plate IV
Saturn, the ringed planet. (Lick Observatory photograph)
Plate VI
The Dumbbell, NGC 6853, an unusual planetary nebula.
(Lick Observatory photograph)
Plate V
The Pleiades, and nebulosity in Taurus, NGC 1432. (Photograph from the Lick Observatories)
Plate VII
The Ring nebula in Lyra, NGC 6720. (Photograph from the Hale Observatories)
Plate VIII
Planetary nebula NGC 6543. (Lick Observatory photograph)
Plate IX
Crab Nebula in Taurus, NGC 1952. Note red illumination of hydrogen and blue haze of synchrotron emission (Lick Observatory photograph).
Plate X
Planetary nebula in Aquarius; NGC 7293. (Photograph from the Hale Observatories)
Plate XI
Orion nebula, NGC 1976, around the Trapezium. (Lick Observatory photograph)
Plate XIV
The Lagoon nebula, NGC 6523. (Lick Observatory photograph)
Plate XII
M51 or NGC 5194, a spiral nebula in Canes Venatici. (Lick Observatory photograph)
Plate XIII
M82 or NGC 3034, an unusual galaxy in Ursa Major. (Lick Observatory photograph)
Plate XV
Orion nebula, NGC 1976, inner region (white) is burnt out in this plate. Compare with Plate XI. (Lick Observatory photograph)
Plate XVI
Veil nebula in Cygnus, NGC 6992.
(Photograph from the Hale Observatories)
Plate XVII
Rosette nebula in Monoceros, NGC 2237. (Photograph from the Hale Observatories)
LUMINOSITIES OF STARS 339
A graph titled "Spectrum-luminosity diagram of 6700 stars in the sun's region of the sky." The x-axis represents absolute visual magnitude ranging from -5 to +15, with increments of 5. The y-axis represents spectral type, labeled O, B, A, F, G, K, M. The main sequence is represented by a horizontal band around the zero point on the y-axis. Above this band are supergiants (SG) and giants (GI). Below the main sequence is a band representing white dwarfs (WD). The sun is indicated at the center of the main sequence.
**Figure 11.27**
Spectrum-luminosity diagram of 6700 stars in the sun's region of the sky. Each dot represents a star. (Diagram by Lund Observatory)
average blue star and the same amount brighter than the average red star of the sequence. Because the sun as viewed from a distance of 10 parsecs would be a faint star to the naked eye, the red stars of the sequence must generally be telescopic objects. Red stars such as Betelgeuse and Antares are among the apparently brightest stars. More distant than 10 parsecs away are much more luminous than the sun. These and other stars of high luminosity are represented by points that appear above the band of the main sequence.
Since its introduction by H. N. Russell in 1913, the spectrum-luminosity diagram has played a leading part in directing the studies of the stars. Ejnar Hertzsprung had previously drawn attention to the sharp distinction between red stars of high and low luminosity and between giant and dwarf stars, respectively. The original term *dwarf* stars is commonly used today to denote main-sequence stars fainter than about absolute visual magnitude +1.
11.28
**Giant and Dwarf Stars**
340
THE STARS
N
Figure 11.29
Sirius and companion photographed with the Sproul 15-inch refractor, the hexagonal diaphragm outside the objective. 1961 March 20, 18:37. North left, right, north below. (Photograph: S. L. Lippincott and J. K. Woolley)
$$L = 4\pi R^2 \sigma$$
The spectrum-luminosity diagram is accordingly known as the Hertzprung-Russell diagram, or the H-R diagram. It is now often superseded by the equivalent color magnitude diagram (11.24A), because the color indexes of stars may be measured more precisely than the spectral types can be estimated, and may also be determined to fainter magnitudes.
**Giant stars,** such as Arcturus and Capella, are decidedly more luminous than main-sequence stars of similar spectral type and therefore having about the same absolute magnitude. They are also brighter because they are larger than the main-sequence stars. **Supergiant stars** are extraordinarily large and luminous giants. Examples are Antares and Betelgeuse.
**Subgiants** are between the giants and the main sequence, and **subdwarfs** are somewhat below this sequence. **White dwarf stars** are far less luminous than main-sequence stars of corresponding spectral type.
Since it is not good enough simply to infer the sizes of the various classes of stars from their light, effort has gone into direct measurements. The most convenient measurements are obtained from eclipsing binaries (14.19) which are also spectroscopic binaries. For the very largest stars we may make direct measurements using interferometric techniques. Michelson and Pease were able, using a Michelson beam interferometer, to obtain the diameters of six stars, Hanbury-Brown and Twiss, using intensity interferometry, have obtained diameters of two main-sequence stars. With the interferometer techniques obtain a measure of the angular diameter and knowledge of the star's parallax is required to convert this to a linear measure. The same statement holds for diameters measured by the lunar occultation technique (6.13).
11.29
White Dwarf Stars
The name given to this star is deceptive because some are yellow and at least one is red. Although their masses average half the sun's mass, their diameters generally range between one half and four times the earth's diameter. Their densities average $$2 \times 10^4$$ times the sun's density and may have much greater values. The companion of Sirius was among the earliest of this remarkable type of stars to become known.
White dwarfs comprise an estimated 3 per cent of all stars of our galaxy; very few luminous novae happen only the very nearest ones to be observed. W. J. Luyten lists about two thousand stars of this type, the majority of which he has discovered. In his photographic search over more than a quarter of a century for stars of large proper motion, which are accordingly nearby, Luyten has found that most of the faint stars among them are red members of this class. As an exception one has been found either a white dwarf or a subdwarf, between the main sequence and the white dwarfs in the color-magnitude diagram.
A white dwarf star is described by Greenstein as mainly a degenerate mass devoid of hydrogen, surrounded by a nondegenerate envelope 65
miles deep, and above this an atmosphere of a sort only a few hundred feet deep. **Degenerate matter** conforms to an equation of state different from the ordinary gas laws. According to the theory, the radius of a completely degenerate star is inversely proportional to the mass, which cannot exceed 1.4 times the sun's mass.
Greenstein has reported on his studies of the spectra of 50 white dwarf stars, which he has already photographed with the 200-inch telescope in his undertaking to record the spectra of all that are available to apparent magnitude 16. Some spectra (Fig. 11.30A) show prominent helium absorption, others show strong dark hydrogen lines, and at least one spectrum has only the H and K lines of ionized calcium and a line of neutral magnesium. The spectra of some stars are so faint that they are lost among the very dense stars, and in some cases (type DC) are not seen at all. The other preliminary types assigned to white dwarfs are DB, DA, DF, DG, and DK; these are in order of increasing color index of the stars. Although there is not a simple relation between the spectra and colors of these stars, the color-magnitude diagram (Fig. 11.30B) reveals a rather convincing sequence below the main sequence.
The theory of general relativity predicts that the lines in the spectrum of a star should be displaced to the red by an amount that is directly
| Spectra of White Dwarf Stars | |
|---|---|
| HZ 29 | -22 |
| Ne | L 1573-31 -09 |
| Hn | L 970-30 |
| Huh | L 532-81 |
| H, Cu$^{\dagger}$ | ROSS 827 -38 |
| Mg, Cu$^{\dagger}$ | ROSS 840 -38 |
| V Mu 2 | +56 |
Figure 11.30A
Spectra of white dwarfs, with prominent elements in each spectral class shown in table.
(Photograph by J. L. Greenstein, California Institute of Technology)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hz |
3440 |
3720 |
3820 |
3965 |
4101 |
4340 |
4472 |
4713 |
4861 |
| Ne |
3614 |
3899 |
4025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Huh |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H, Cu$^{\dagger}$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mg, Cu$^{\dagger}$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| LUMINOSITIES OF STARS | 341 |
|---|
| |
|---|
| 11.30 Spectra of White Dwarf Stars | |
|---|
HZ 29 -22 L 1573-31 -09 L 970-30 L 532-81 ROSS 827 -38 ROSS 840 -38 V Mu 2 +56 | |
|---|
| Spectra of White Dwarf Stars | | |
|---|
| Hz | 3440 3720 3820 3965 4101 4340 4472 4713 4861 | | |
|---|
|
|---|
| Ne | 3614 3899 4025 | | |
|---|
|
|---|
| Hn | | | |
|---|
|
|---|
| Huh | | | |
|---|
|
|---|
| H, Cu$^{\dagger}$ | | | |
|---|
|
|---|
| Mg, Cu$^{\dagger}$ | | | |
|---|
|
|---|
342
THE STARS
White Dwarfs of Krones, Photometric and Photoelectric Color Harris B-V
Figure 11.308
Color-absolute magnitude diagram of white dwarf stars. (Magnitudes and color indexes by D. Harris; Diagram by J. L. Greenstein)
proportional to the cube root of the star's mean density. In the case of the sun the predicted displacement corresponds to a velocity of recession of only 0.6 km/sec and is masked by other effects. For the very dense white dwarfs the displacements should be much greater.
D. M. Harris has measured a small but significant relativity shift of the lines in the spectrum of the 9th-magnitude white dwarf companion of the star 40 Eridani. His measured redshift is equivalent to a velocity of recession of 21 km/sec, which is considered in satisfactory agreement with the predicted value of 17 km/sec corresponding to a diameter of 22,500 kilometers for this star.
The relative numbers of stars for successive intervals of absolute magni-
tude in a sample volume of space constitute the luminosity function for that sample. The broken line of Fig. 11.31 refers to samples in the sun's vicinity, studied especially by P. J. van Rhijn in Holland and S. W. Mc-
Cuskey at Warner and Swasey Observatory. The supergiants, at the left
Luminosity Function
11.31
LUMINOSITIES OF STARS 343
of its bright end, are scarce. Beyond the faint end, at the right, the numbers are still increasing. For stars nearest the sun indications are that the maximum number is reached at absolute photoraphic magnitude +13.5.
Stars of low luminosity are evidently in the great majority in a sample volume of space around the sun. As we see them in the sky, however, the stars of high luminosity are the most numerous. The reason is that the less luminous stars must be nearer in order to be visible.
As examples, consider the lucid stars. The greatest distance, $r$ in parsecs, at which a star of absolute visual magnitude $M$ is visible to the naked eye is found by the formula (11.29): $\log r = (6.2 - M + 5)/5$. Here we suppose that the faintest lucid star is of apparent visual magnitude +6.2 and that the limiting distance is 1700 parsecs for a supergiant star of absolute magnitude $-8$ and is reduced to 17 parsecs for a star as bright as the sun. The limit would be only 0.17 parsec, or slightly more than half a light
**Figure 11.31**
Relative Numbers of Stars of Different Luminosities. The logarithms of the numbers for successive intervals of absolute magnitude for stars in the sun's vicinity are represented by this curve, and for stars of the globular cluster M 3 by the full line. (Diagram by Allan R. Sandage.)
A graph showing relative numbers of stars of different luminosities. The x-axis represents Absolute Photographic Magnitude, $M_{\text{app}}$, ranging from -2 to 14. The y-axis shows $\log \delta(M)$, ranging from -4 to 4. There are two curves: one labeled "Van Rhijn" and another labeled "M3". The Van Rhijn curve starts at a value near -4 on the y-axis and rises sharply to a peak around log $\delta(M) = 0$ at about $M_{\text{app}} = -2$. It then decreases rapidly to a value near -3 on the y-axis at about $M_{\text{app}} = 0$. The M3 curve starts at a value near -4 on the y-axis and rises slowly to a peak around log $\delta(M) = 0$ at about $M_{\text{app}} = -2$. It then decreases slowly to a value near -3 on the y-axis at about $M_{\text{app}} = 0$. Both curves show a peak around log $\delta(M) = 0$ at about $M_{\text{app}} = -2$. The Van Rhijn curve has a higher peak than the M3 curve.
Van Rhijn
M3
M3
344
THE STARS
year, for a star having $M = +15$; such a star would have to be much nearer us than the nearest known star in order to be visible to the naked eye.
The full curve of the figure refers to stars of a different sample, studied by Sandage in the globular cluster M 3 (16.16).
REVIEW QUESTIONS
1. What is meant by:
a) heliocentric parallax
b) annual parallax
c) trigonometric parallax
d) absolute parallax
2. Show with the aid of a diagram what the parallactic ellipse looks like for a star at:
a) R.A. 18° Decl. + 65°
b) R.A. 18° Decl. + 28°
c) R.A. 18° Decl. + 20°
3. For a given star, at what points in the earth's orbit is the parallax best determined? Can you suggest some reasons for measuring the parallax at points other than these best points?
4. Define proper motion. Why is it measured? Why is a star with a large proper motion likely to prove interesting?
5. How is a star's radial velocity measured?
6. The Large Magellanic Cloud shows almost no annual change in radial velocity. Why?
7. Vega exhibits a small annual variation about its mean value of ~19 km/sec.
Explain.
8. In what two ways do we determine the solar motion? How is the solar motion measured?
9. Describe the principle features of the Harvard spectral classification system.
10. Show that a magnitude difference of 5 corresponds to a difference of a factor of 10 in the distances for two stars of the identical spectral type.
11. Radio astronomers have a term equivalent to "absolute magnitude" called "radio magnitude." What is this? How does it differ from "absolute magnitude"? In relating terms, one magnitude corresponds to how many decibels?
12. In the telescope the visual binary 85 Pegasus resolves into two stars of apparent magnitudes of 5.8 and 8.8. What is the combined magnitude of the two stars?
13. If the color index of a star is 0.0 what is the temperature of the star? What type of star does this correspond to?
14. What is meant by the term main sequence?
15. If white dwarfs are as numerous as 3% of all stars, why is it that we see so few?
16. What would be the distinction of a star having an absolute magnitude of +15 and an apparent magnitude of +10?
17. Construct and discuss the spectrum-luminosity diagram obtained from Table 11.1.
REFERENCES 345
Dufay, Jean, Introduction to Astrophysics: The Stars, trans. O. Gingerich, New York, Dover Publications, 1964.
Page, Thornton, and W. L. Page, Starlight, New York: The Macmillan Co., 1967.
van de Kamp, Peter, Stellar Astronomy, New York, Random House, 1952.
Wood, Frank B., ed., Photometric Astronomy for the Amateur. New York: The Macmillan Co., 1963.
Allen, Clabon Walter, Astrophysical Quantities, 2nd ed., London: Athlone Press, 1985.
Strand, K. A., Basic Astronomical Data. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968.
Swihart, Thomas L., Astrophysics and Stellar Astronomy. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1968.
van de Kamp, Peter, Principles of Astrometry. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper & Co., 1967.
Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in the Andes, near La Serena, Chile. (AURA Photograph)
FOR FURTHER STUDY
12
STELLAR ATMOSPHERES AND INTERIORS
ATOMIC STRUCTURE AND RADIATION - STELLAR ATMOSPHERES - EXTENDED ATMOSPHERES AND ENVELOPES - INTERIORS OF THE STARS
Like the sun, the stars are globes of intensely hot gas. Their radiations emerge from their photospheres and filter through their atmospheres, where dark lines are found in their spectra. The atmospheres around some stars are extended enough to be seen clearly in the spectra, and larger envelopes may be visible directly with the telescope.
This chapter describes evidence given by stellar spectra concerning the exteriors of the stars. It then considers what the interiors may be like to produce these spectra, and what processes in the interiors may supply the energy to keep the stars on fire. There follows a brief account of some relations between the constituents of a gas and the radiations they absorb and emit.
The "Owl" nebula in Ursa Major. (Photograph from the Hale Observatories)
347
348
STELLAR ATMOSPHERES AND INTERIORS
**ATOMIC STRUCTURE AND RADIATION**
The study of stellar atmospheres and interiors draws heavily upon atomic and nuclear physics. Here we take a simplified concept of the atom to explain our observations. Similar concepts are used to explain molecular spectra.
**12.1 Constituents of the Atom**
Atoms are the building blocks of all material. They are composed essentially of electrons, protons, and neutrons. The electron is the lightest of these constituents; its mass is $9.1053 \times 10^{-3}$ grams and it carries unit negative charge of electricity. The proton is 1836.57 times as massive as the electron and carries unit positive charge. The neutron has about the same mass as the proton and is electrically neutral.
The nucleus of the atom ranges progressively from the single proton of the ordinary hydrogen atom to compact groups of protons and neutrons in heavier atoms. Each proton contributes one unit to the positive charge on the nucleus. In the normal atom the nucleus is surrounded by negatively charged electrons equal in number to the protons, so that the atom as a whole is electrically neutral.
Among the products that issue from atoms when they are vigorously bombarded or disintegrate spontaneously are positrons and photons. The positron has the same mass as the electron but carries unit positive charge. The photon has half a bundle of energy. There are also mesons and particles having masses greater than that of the proton. All these constituents and products of atoms are considered to be wave formations, but are often pictured as particles.
The following descriptions of some atomic processes employ the conventional model of the atom proposed, in 1913, by N. Bohr. They begin with the atom of hydrogen, the simplest and also the most abundant in the universe.
**12.2 Model of the Hydrogen Atom**
The normal hydrogen atom consists of one proton attended by a single electron. In the Bohr model, this electron revolves around the proton analogously to a planet revolving around the sun. The force holding the electron in orbit is that of the attraction between the unlike electric charges which, like the gravitational force, is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. Whereas a planet in a two-body system would remain always in the same orbit, the electron may be found at different times in a variety of possible orbits.
ATOMIC STRUCTURE AND RADIATION 349
A diagram showing the orbits of electrons around a hydrogen atom. The Lyman series, Balmer series, Paschen series, and Brackett series are labeled. The radii of the permitted orbits around the proton (Fig. 12.2) are proportional to the squares of the integers; that of the innermost orbit is about half an angstrom. The atom does not absorb or emit radiation as long as the electron remains in the same orbit. It absorbs energy, as from radiation that strikes it, only when it can find the right quantity to raise its electron exactly to a higher orbit against the attraction of the proton. An electron may fall back again, releasing as radiation the energy it absorbed. Here is justification for what we have previously stated (4.8), that gas abstracts from light passing through it the same wavelengths that the gas itself emits.
The relation between the gain or loss of energy by the atom in such a transition and the frequency of the radiation absorbed or emitted is $E_1 - E_2 = h \nu$, where $E_1$ is the energy of the atom when the electron is in one orbit, and $E_2$ is the energy when it is in another orbit. The difference between the two states is the photon which is absorbed and then emitted. The quantity of this unit bundle of energy is given by the constant $h$ times the frequency, $\nu$, of the radiation. Thus the frequency of the radiation absorbed or emitted is higher, and the wavelength is shorter, as the energy difference between the two orbits is greater.
A prominent feature of the spectra of the hotter stars as ordinarily photographed is a long series of hydrogen lines. Beginning with the Fraunhofer C line in the red, the lines appear along the spectrum at diminishing intervals, like a succession of telegraph poles receding in the distance, until they close up in the near ultraviolet. These lines of the Balmer series (Fig. 12.3) are designated in order: H$\alpha$, H$\beta$, H$\gamma$, and so on. More than 30 are identified in stellar spectra and in our atmosphere.
Balmer, a Swiss physicist, derived in 1885 an empirical formula by
Figure 12.2 Conventional representation of the hydrogen atom. Possible orbits of the electron around the nucleus are shown as circles.
$$\Delta t \sim 10^{-8} \text{ secs}$$
12.3 Series of Hydrogen Lines
350 STELLAR ATMOSPHERES AND INTERIORS
H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H, H
**Figure 12.3**
Hydrogen lines in the spectrum of an A9V Star. The Balmer series is shown from $\mathrm{H}_6$ to the limit of the series in the deep ultraviolet. (Courtesy of Catharina Germany)
which the wavelength of any line in the series may be calculated. In the more general form, which applies to other hydrogen line series as well,
the formula is:
$$\frac{1}{\lambda} = R \left(1/m^2 - 1/n^2\right),$$
where $\lambda$ is the wavelength of the line in centimeters; $R$ is about 109.678 km$^{-1}$; $m$ is the number of the orbit in the Bohr model from which the electron is raised to produce a dark line and $n$ is the number to produce a bright line; $m$ must be any whole number greater than $m$, representing the number of the orbit to which the electron is raised. A single hydrogen atom can promote only one electron transition at any instant; but in a gas containing very many atoms all possible transitions are likely to be in progress.
In the Balmer series, $m = 2$ and $n$ is put equal to $3$, $4$, $5$, and so on. Four other hydrogen series have been observed in celestial and laboratory spectra. These are the Lyman series ($m = 1$) in the extreme ultraviolet; the Paschen series ($m = 3$), the Brackett series ($m = 4$), and the Pfund series ($m = 5$), all in the infrared. The lines in the spectra of some other chemical elements are also arrayed in series.
**Table 12.1 lists the names, symbols, atomic numbers**, and atomic weights of 96 chemical elements. Numbers 93 to 96, and more recently to 103, were produced in radiation laboratories.
The **atomic number** of an element is the number of protons in the nucleus and also the number of electrons around the nucleus of the normal atom. All atoms having the same atomic number belong to the same chemical element.
12.4 Chemical Elements
ATOMIC STRUCTURE AND RADIATION 351
The *atomic weight* is the mass of the atom. The unit of mass employed in the table is one sixtieth of the mass of the average oxygen atom, taken as weight 16.0000; the value of the unit is $1.66 \times 10^{-24}$ grams. The atomic weight given here is that of the element, which may contain different kinds of atoms, or isotopes, of the same element, which differ in mass because their nuclei have different numbers of neutrons.
The *mass number* of an atom is its atomic weight rounded off to the nearest whole number, the sum of its protons and neutrons. Thus the mass numbers of hydrogen, helium, and lithium corresponding to their weights in the table are 1, 4, and 7. In formulas of nuclear reactions a particular atom is conveniently designated by its symbol having the atomic number as subscript and the mass number as superscript. As an example, the iron isotope $_{26}^{56}\mathrm{Fe}$ contains 26 protons and 30 neutrons.
Turning from the simple hydrogen atom to more complex ones, we find less confusion of electron transitions than might at first be expected. Most of the electrons are so firmly held in filled shells that they are not easily raised to higher levels.
The *shells* are the same as the Bohr hydrogen orbits. They are filled in order of distance from the nucleus when they acquire $2n^2$ electrons, where $n$ is the number of the Bohr orbit. Thus the first shell is filled by 2 electrons, the second by 8, and so on. A full shell will not receive additional electrons and is reluctant to release any that it possesses. As examples, Fig. 12.5 shows the outer structures of a number of lighter atoms having their electrons in the lowest possible orbits.
The normal hydrogen atom (atomic number 1) has its single electron in the first orbit, from which it can be raised with moderate effort. The helium atom (number 2) has its two electrons filling the first shell, which is not easily broken. The lithium atom (number 3) has two electrons locked in the inner shell and a third in the second orbit, from which it is easily removed. In the successively heavier atoms: beryllium, boron, carbon, and so on, electrons are added one at a time to match the added protons. In the neon atom (number 10) the second shell is filled. The sodium atom (number 11) has three electrons in its second shell and an additional electron in the third orbit ready to jump out on slight provocation.
Some of the atoms represented in the figure have shells in the making and others have only filled shells, as in the cases of the chemically inactive elements helium and neon. Evidently the amount of energy the atom must absorb to get an electron from its normal position to a higher level depends on the number of protons attracting from within
The Electron Shells
TABLE 12.I The Chemical Elements |
| ELEMENT |
SYMBOL |
ATOMIC NUMBER |
ATOMIC WEIGHT* |
ELEMENT |
SYMBOL |
ATOMIC NUMBER |
ATOMIC WEIGHT* |
| Hydrogen |
H |
1 |
1.0080 |
Indium |
In |
49 |
114.82 |
| Heliium |
He |
2 |
4.0030 |
Tin |
Ti |
51 |
117.60 |
| Lithium |
Li |
3 |
6.9963 |
Anthimony |
Sb |
51 |
121.76 |
| Beryllium |
Be |
4 |
9.0130 |
Tellurium |
Te |
52 |
127.61 |
| Boron |
B |
5 |
10.8120 |
Iodine |
Ia |
53 |
126.91 |
| Carbon |
C |
6 |
12.0107 |
Krypton |
Xe |
54 | | | | |
|---|
| Fluorine | F | 18.9990 | | Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lanthanum La Lant
| Cesium Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs Cs C
| CesiumCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsC
| CesiumCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsCsC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
| CesiumC
|
|---|
| | |
|---|