Sync ParaSkill detect-presentation-gaming

LICENSE

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+MIT License
+
+Copyright (c) 2026 bhxdianzhang
+
+Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
+of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
+in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
+to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
+copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
+furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+
+The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
+copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+
+THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
+AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
+OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
+SOFTWARE.

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+---
+license: mit
+language:
+- zh
+- en
+tags:
+- codex-skill
+- ai-agent
+- scientific-writing
+- research-workflow
+- paraskill
+- paradoxgpt
+- checker
+pretty_name: DetectPresentationGaming
+---
+
+# DetectPresentationGaming
+
+`detect-presentation-gaming` is a ParaSkill research workflow skill for the `checker` family.
+
+## Purpose
+
+Detect whether a paper's perceived strengths come from genuine substance or from presentation gaming — strength inflation, parroting of self-positioning language, or "first/fundamental/comprehensive" claims without evidence. The defensive flip of ARGAR: turn its attack knowledge into a detector so authors and reviewers can catch repackaging. Use to audit a draft (or a revision) before submission.
+
+## Metadata
+
+- Family: `checker`
+- Owner model: `ParadoxGPT-Checker-4B`
+- Output type: `diagnosis`
+- Version: `0.1`
+- Default language: `zh`
+
+## Included Files
+
+```text
+DetectPresentationGaming/
+  SKILL.md
+  agents/openai.yaml
+  README.md
+  LICENSE
+```
+
+`SKILL.md` is the executable skill instruction. `README.md` is the Hugging Face card.
+
+## Installation
+
+Copy this folder into a Codex-discoverable skills directory, or reference `SKILL.md` directly from an agent workflow.
+
+```bash
+mkdir -p ~/.codex/skills
+cp -r DetectPresentationGaming ~/.codex/skills/detect-presentation-gaming
+```
+
+## Source
+
+This skill is part of the ParaSkill library for ParadoxGPT. The full routing table is maintained in `SKILL_INDEX.json` in the source bundle.

SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+---
+name: detect-presentation-gaming
+description: >-
+  Detect whether a paper's perceived strengths come from genuine substance or
+  from presentation gaming — strength inflation, parroting of self-positioning
+  language, or "first/fundamental/comprehensive" claims without evidence. The
+  defensive flip of ARGAR: turn its attack knowledge into a detector so authors
+  and reviewers can catch repackaging. Use to audit a draft (or a revision)
+  before submission.
+metadata:
+  owner_model: ParadoxGPT-Checker-4B
+  skill_family: checker
+  version: "0.1"
+  output_type: diagnosis
+  default_language: zh
+  trigger_keywords: [presentation gaming, strength inflation, parroting, overclaim detection, repackaging, gaming AI review, 包装, 夸大, gaming]
+  required_inputs: [paper_context, claimed_strengths, evidence]
+  optional_inputs: [reviews]
+  handoff_to: [detect-limitation-laundering, enforce-content-preservation-zones, identify-fatal-concerns]
+---
+
+# Detect Presentation Gaming
+
+## Purpose
+
+检测一篇论文的 perceived strengths 是来自**真实实质**还是 **presentation gaming**——strength inflation(把局部结果包装成普遍贡献)、parroting(照搬论文自我标定词当优点)、无证据的 "first/fundamental/comprehensive"。这是 ARGAR 攻击知识的**防御翻转**:把"怎么 gaming"变成"怎么检测 gaming",让作者/审稿人在投稿前抓住 repackaging。
+
+## When to Use
+
+- 投稿前自查:我的优点是实质还是包装?
+- 审视一次修改是否在 gaming(对比改前改后)。
+- 作为 reviewer,判断一篇 strengths 是否 inflation。
+
+## Do Not Use
+
+- 只查 limitation 是否被 laundering → 用 `detect-limitation-laundering`。
+- 查修改是否越界改了数字/公式 → 用 `enforce-content-preservation-zones`。
+- 想找致命 concern → 用 `identify-fatal-concerns`。
+
+## Required Inputs
+
+- `paper_context`: 全文(定位证据)
+- `claimed_strengths`: 论文(或修改)声称的 strengths
+- `evidence`: 论文内可用的证据
+
+## optional Inputs
+
+- `reviews`: 已有 review(看 reviewer 是否被 parroting 带偏)
+
+## Output Contract
+
+输出必须包含:
+
+1. **per_strength_verdict** — 每条 claimed_strength:genuine / inflated / parroted + 依据。
+2. **inflation_evidence** — 哪些措辞("first/comprehensive/fundamental")无证据支撑。
+3. **parroting_instances** — reviewer(若有)复述论文自我标定词的地方。
+4. **substance_gap** — perceived strength 与真实 evidence 的落差。
+5. **verdict** — overall: clean / borderline / gamed,附最关键的 1-2 个问题。
+
+## Procedure
+
+1. 逐条 claimed_strength 核对是否有 paper 内实质证据。
+2. 标 inflation 措辞(无证据的强词)。
+3. 若有 reviews,看 reviewer 是否 parrot 论文标定词(ARGAR 的典型信号)。
+4. 量化 substance_gap,给 verdict。
+
+## Quality Bar
+
+一个好的输出必须:
+
+- 每条 verdict 指向可核查证据(或其缺失)。
+- 区分"措辞夸张但有事"与"纯包装无证据"。
+- parroting 有具体复述实例。
+
+一个差的输出:
+
+- 笼统"有夸大"无指向。
+- 把正常强调误判为 inflation。
+- 忽视 reviewer parroting 信号。
+
+## Failure Modes
+
+- **误判正常强调**:有证据的强措辞被当 inflation。
+- **漏 parroting**:reviewer 复述词没被抓。
+- **只看措辞不看证据**:把"comprehensive"一刀切。
+
+## Handoff
+
+- 发现 limitation 被不诚实处理 → `detect-limitation-laundering`
+- 发现改动了数字/公式 → `enforce-content-preservation-zones`
+- gamed 的 strength 关联致命问题 → `identify-fatal-concerns`
+
+## Example
+
+Input:
+
+```
+claimed_strengths: ["the first method addressing a fundamental gap"]
+evidence: [Fig2 三任务曲线;method §3]
+```
+
+Output(节选):
+
+```
+per_strength_verdict:
+  - "first/fundamental" → inflated。"first"无检索依据;"fundamental"无理论支撑;实质证据仅 Fig2(局部)。
+inflation_evidence: "first", "fundamental" 无对应证据。
+substance_gap: 实质=局部不饱和;措辞=首创/根本。落差大。
+verdict: gamed(borderline)。建议降措辞为"we show interaction rounds are a scalable resource, with unsaturated gains (Fig2)"。
+```

agents/openai.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+interface:
+  display_name: "Detect Presentation Gaming"
+  short_description: "Detect whether a paper's perceived strengths come from genuine substance or from presentat"
+  default_prompt: "Use $detect-presentation-gaming for this research-writing task."