It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ThePeopleParty
Im not big on all this stuff, but i have a question. If mars was once in earths spot and so was the otheer planets, does this mean they where all habitable at some point?
So mars and the rest would of been "earth like"?
Originally posted by davespanners
reply to post by sleeper
I just saw this post if the Recent Posts page and now I am really confused!
Did you make up this theory yourself?
Or is it something that other people have discussed?
I only ask because I once randomly met a girl in Trafalgar Square during a protest march, we got talking and she told me more or less what stated in the first post, that the sun was "pregnant" and was going to give birth to a planet.
At the time I thought it was a really random thing to say and the conversation just tailed off.
This would have been around 2002 so she couldn't have got it from your post
Originally posted by sleeper
And may produce another planet or two in the not so distant future
Like a hairball that has formed in the interior of the sun, planets get spit out every now and then.
As the planets age they move ever so slowly to the outskirts of the solar system and become debris, some of this debris collides with other debris and ricochets back into the interior of the solar system as comets, asteroids and moons.
All the planets were birthed by the sun, the youngest being Mercury, the oldest Neptune, Pluto and the other bodies in the Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud are where remnants of the early solar system and dead planets reside.
The planets are gradually pushed away from the sun over the span of millions and billions of years and as their orbits enlarge and the sun’s gravitational pull on them decreases they bloat up like gas giants---and then deflate and congeal as they enter the frigid zone at the periphery of the solar system.
Mercury, will move into Venus’ orbit, Venus into earth’s orbit, earth into Mars’ orbit, and so on
The planets are held in orbit by the pull of the sun’s gravitation and the push of the Solar wind. It’s a delicate balance that slowly moves the planets from the interior to the outskirts as if riding on a large invisible conveyor belt.
Galaxies work in a similar way, producing stars at the center and kicking them out to the outskirts like popcorn in a kettle, where they cool off in clusters or individually and then slowly make their way back to the center of the galaxy
My two cents on how planetary systems evolve---
Originally posted by sleeper
Besides a few basics no one really knows much about what the sun can or can’t do. Ejecting a small amount of mass the size of Mercury is so infinitesimal for something as large as the sun that it doesn’t equal a human sloughing off a single dust mite from his skin---and therefore could easily pass under any gravitational or magnetic nuance---in my opinion
Originally posted by your_evidence
nice theory, very entertaining and humorous. But doesn't comply with certain laws of physics.
Originally posted by redseal
pregnant? well who it the universe is the father?? Explain this to me, how will it evolve another planet??
Originally posted by Johnmike
This makes no sense at all. How does whatever the sun spits out get propelled into orbit?
Why exactly do they move farther and farther away from the sun?
Originally posted by Long Lance
these articles are from 2003, no matter what kind of theory you proposed, the concept is the same and this thread is therefore not original. how hard can a search for 'planet birthing' be?
credit where it's due, pls. add some unverifiable spin and call it enlightened, funny isn't it? NOT.
Originally posted by Lexion
Snowman, the acronym is actually KISS, but I digress.
Does noone else see what Sleeper is doing ? This is another point farm.
I'm actually shocked the mods aren't on to this.
Sadly, I'm adding to his farming by trying to point out the obvious.
Originally posted by Smack
Lets be clear -- what Sleeper has put forward is not entirely his own theory. It shares many of the characteristics of a body of scholarly work, known as the Electric Universe theory or Plasma Cosmology.
There does exist a body of credible, peer reviewed work on Plasma Cosmology theory. I suggest some of you take the time to educate yourselves on the topic. ...or you could just assume you know better and place any debate outside the scope of the status quo into the 'skunk works' pile.
Whatever makes you feel more comfortable.
[edit on 11-3-2007 by Smack]
Originally posted by DarkSide
Why are the outermost planets gaseous and the innermost telluric? Are the telluric and gas planets from....hmmm...different fathers?
Originally posted by SinkingSun
I think I remember some ancient civilizations had thought of the sun as a portal..
If the sun has given birth like this, maybe it has been witnessed a few times in our history..
Originally posted by WeTIredABC
I dont buy the whole big bang theory myself.
All the UFOs sucking on our sun have had me concerned. What is your take on that?
Personally,I wouldnt be suprised at ALL if a planet popped out of the sun.Or a fleet of ufos.
The more BS Nasa tells us the more we know what to RULE OUT
The sun could be a portal of some sort since alot of history has people saying things/gods come out of the sun.
Im sure people had better things to imagine than making up stories about things coming out of the sun.THey would know that no one would believe it.