Food forests are not the same as natural forests as they are manmade and don’t just grow naturally. A food forest lacks some elements of the regular forest like rivers, streams, or creeks flowing through it. They get the water through manual modes controlled by humans for their needs, generally via permaculture design.
Differences Between Forests and Food Forests
A food forest contains several plants grown intentionally to generate the produce for feeding people. That’s controlled across the layers of plants included. However, forests generally contain tress, wherein vines and berry bushes can be discovered developing naturally. Moreover, regular forests aren’t focused on feeding. With a food forest, fruits and products need to be picked from time to time. However, on the other hand, a regular forest is fully self-sustaining.
While both have trees, those grown in each type are distinct.
Similarities between Forests and Food Forests
Besides differences, forests and food forests share various similarities. Both do not take many years to develop naturally because they are not fed with pesticides. Both attract animals, but a food forest is intentionally controlled to attract fewer animals.
Both natural and food forests are comprised of several layers. However, a food forest is made with the layer concept replicated from the one in the natural system.
So, although appearing similar because both have trees across a landscape, natural and food forests share some similarities and dissimilarities. Whatever forest you are planning or managing, it is essential to invest in forest risk assessment to ensure yours lasts longer.