Datasets:
Upload README.md with huggingface_hub
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -41,11 +41,12 @@ two coding tasks at different difficulty levels:
|
|
| 41 |
- **portscout** (easy): write a single-file concurrent port scanner using stdlib. create, test, done.
|
| 42 |
- **logpulse** (hard): write a multi-file CLI log watcher with real-time stats, regex alerts, a fake log generator, a README, and self-test. requires file creation, debugging, and iterative fixes.
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-
|
| 45 |
- **Qwopus3.5-9B-Coder** (9B dense, 43 tok/s, fully in VRAM)
|
| 46 |
- **Qwen3.6-35B-A3B MoE + thinking** (35B MoE, 3B active, 35 tok/s, ncmoe=30, reasoning on)
|
| 47 |
- **Qwen3.6-35B-A3B MoE no-think** (35B MoE, 3B active, 35 tok/s, ncmoe=30, reasoning off)
|
| 48 |
- **gpt-oss-20b** (21B MoE, 3.6B active, ncmoe=30, OpenAI Apache 2.0, native MXFP4 FFN)
|
|
|
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
## key findings
|
| 51 |
|
|
@@ -63,6 +64,10 @@ four model configurations:
|
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
7. **agent framework matters as much as the model.** Pi's 4-tool interface (read/write/edit/bash) produces fewer tokens per turn and simpler tool call schemas than Hermes Agent's patch-based approach. this reduces context pressure and makes structured output easier for smaller models.
|
| 65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 66 |
## deep-dive benchmark: gpt-oss-20b (8 additional prompts)
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
after the initial comparison, we ran 8 more prompts through gpt-oss-20b to stress-test reliability across different coding skills.
|
|
|
|
| 41 |
- **portscout** (easy): write a single-file concurrent port scanner using stdlib. create, test, done.
|
| 42 |
- **logpulse** (hard): write a multi-file CLI log watcher with real-time stats, regex alerts, a fake log generator, a README, and self-test. requires file creation, debugging, and iterative fixes.
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
+
five model configurations:
|
| 45 |
- **Qwopus3.5-9B-Coder** (9B dense, 43 tok/s, fully in VRAM)
|
| 46 |
- **Qwen3.6-35B-A3B MoE + thinking** (35B MoE, 3B active, 35 tok/s, ncmoe=30, reasoning on)
|
| 47 |
- **Qwen3.6-35B-A3B MoE no-think** (35B MoE, 3B active, 35 tok/s, ncmoe=30, reasoning off)
|
| 48 |
- **gpt-oss-20b** (21B MoE, 3.6B active, ncmoe=30, OpenAI Apache 2.0, native MXFP4 FFN)
|
| 49 |
+
- **OmniCoder-9B** (9B dense, 42 tok/s, Tesslate, based on Qwen3.5-9B, fine-tuned on 425K agentic trajectories)
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
## key findings
|
| 52 |
|
|
|
|
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
7. **agent framework matters as much as the model.** Pi's 4-tool interface (read/write/edit/bash) produces fewer tokens per turn and simpler tool call schemas than Hermes Agent's patch-based approach. this reduces context pressure and makes structured output easier for smaller models.
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
+
8. **agentic fine-tuning helps code quality, not agent loops.** OmniCoder-9B (Tesslate, 425K agentic trajectories on Qwen3.5-9B) produced the cleanest first-shot code of any model tested: 83-line portscout in <1 min with no self-fixes needed. but it failed on the hard task the same way Qwopus 9B did: ran a blocking command without timeout, then got stuck in a generation loop. code generation and agent loop management are separate skills, and fine-tuning on coding trajectories doesn't fix the latter.
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
9. **thinking mode is a trap for 9B models.** OmniCoder-9B with default thinking mode burned all tokens on reasoning_content with 0 code output (same as Qwen3.6). the `-rea off` server flag is mandatory. once disabled, the model is fast (42 tok/s) and produces clean direct output.
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
## deep-dive benchmark: gpt-oss-20b (8 additional prompts)
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
after the initial comparison, we ran 8 more prompts through gpt-oss-20b to stress-test reliability across different coding skills.
|